Back
GOUTAM BHADURI, SACHIN SINGH RAJPUT
Kirti Dewangan, W/o. Arjun Kumar Dewangan, D/o. Shri Jagat Ram Dewangan – Appellant
Versus
Arjun Kumar Dewangan, S/o. Shri Anand Ram Dewangan – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Goutam Bhaduri, J.
Heard.
1. This appeal is against the judgement and decree dated 29/11/2018 passed by the Family Court, Rajnandgaon in Civil Suit No.30-A/17 whereby petition filed by the husband seeking divorce under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act was allowed. The wife being aggrieved by such jugement and decree is before this Court in appeal.
2. The facts of this case are that the parties were married on 16/05/2005 and thereafter according to the husband, the wife stayed with the husband for few days and went back to her parental home. It was pleaded that she appeared in an examination for shiksha karmi and after the marriage she got selected. Therefore, on the pretext that she has to discharge her job for some reason or other, she remained out of the company of the husband. Husband further alleged that whenever advise was given to her to stay alongwith husband, he was being abused and was meted with all mental and physical cruelty. The allegations are also levelled that even the family members of the husband were abused and physical assault was also not restrained. Further husband stated that the wife wanted to keep him with her at her parental place which the husb
Declaration of legitimacy can be granted only when there is admitted or proved matrimonial relationship.
Section 112 of Indian Evidence Act, which reads as birth during marriage, conclusive proof of legitimacy.
DNA Test – It is not always necessary to conduct DNA test to ascertain whether a particular child was born to a particular person – It is burden of person who alleges or disputes paternity that he ha....
(1) DNA test – Paternity of child – Any Matrimonial (Civil) dispute between husband and wife pertaining to child born from wedlock, cannot be used for their own benefit by way of DNA Paternity Test, ....
Point of law: The only disadvantage to the child which is put forward as an argument against the use of a blood test, not for therapeutic purposes but to ascertain paternity, is that the child is exp....
The only disadvantage to the child which is put forward as an argument against the use of a blood test, not for therapeutic purposes but to ascertain paternity, is that the child is exposed to the ri....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
