SANJAY K. AGRAWAL, RADHAKISHAN AGRAWAL
Meelu Ram Nishad S/o Kaliram Nishad – Appellant
Versus
State Of Chhattisgarh, Through Police Station – Tumgaon – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Radhakishan Agrawal, J.
1. This criminal appeal preferred by the appellant-accused person under Section 374 (2) of Cr.P.C. is directed against the impugned judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 16.01.2014 passed in Sessions Trial No.52/2012 by the Court of learned Sessions Judge, Mahasamund (C.G.) whereby the appellant has been convicted for offence punishable under Section 302 of the IPC and sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and fine of Rs.1,000/-, in default of payment of fine, he shall suffer additional rigorous imprisonment for three months.
2. Case of the prosecution, in brief, is that elder brother of the appellant, namely, Satosh Pateva lodged a report in Police Chowki Patewa to the effect that on 07.04.2012 between 12:00 to 02:00 or in and around, wife of the appellant – Dropati Bai was found dead inside the house. It is alleged by the prosecution that on account of old quarrel between them, the appellant committed her murder by sharp edged weapon, i.e. Kattal (used for fish cutting/tabbal) and thereafter he ran away from the spot.
3. During investigation, inquest (Ex.P.2) over the dead body was conducted in presence of witnesses. Spot map (Ex.P
Shambhu Nath Mehra v. The State of Ajmer
Nagendra Sah v. State of Bihar
Gurcharan Singh v. State of Punjab
Sharad Birdhichand Sarda vs. State of Maharashtra
Shivaji Sahabrao Bobade v. State of Maharashtra
Trimukh Maroti Kirkan vs. State of Maharashtra
Nika Ram v. State of Himachal Pradesh
Ganeshlal v. State of Maharashtra
State of U.P. v. Dr. Ravindra Prakash Mittal AIR 1992 SC 2045
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.