Back
NARENDRA KUMAR VYAS
Sudhir Bhavsar S/o Late Shri T. M. Bhavsar – Appellant
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
NARENDRA KUMAR VYAS, J.
1. The appellant by way of this appeal has challenged the judgment of conviction dated 03.09.2002 passed by the Special Judge and the First Additional Sessions Judge, Jagdalpur District Bastar (C.G.) in Special Case No. 3/99 whereby and whereunder, he has been convicted and sentenced as under:
| Conviction U/s. | Sentence R.I. | Fine | In default of payment of fine |
| U/s 13(1) (C) read with Section 13(2) of PC Act, 1988 | 2 Years | 20,000/- | R.I. for 1 year |
| U/s 467 of IPC | 2 Years | 10,000/- | R.I. for 6 months |
| U/s 468 of IPC | 2 Years | 10,000/- | R.I. for 6 months |
| U/s 471 of IPC | 2 Years | 10,000/- | R.I. for 6 months |
| U/s 120-B of IPC | 2 Years | 10,000/- | R.I. for 6 months |
2. In brief, the prosecution story is that the District Rural Development Agency under mandatory employment scheme for the year 1994-95 has granted approval to the Executive Engineer, Rural Development Department, Kondagaon for construction of stop dam at village Nayanar Tahsil Keshkal District Bastar with an estimated cost of co
Accusation under the Prevention of Corruption Act requires credible evidence of misconduct, and procedures for collecting evidence must be strictly adhered to, particularly with regards to handwritin....
The prosecution must prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt; reliance on extra-judicial confessions without corroborative evidence is insufficient for conviction.
The High Court has the power to reverse the findings of acquittal by a trial court, but it will only do so if there are strong reasons based on evidence which can dislodge the findings arrived at by ....
For an offence punishable under Section 13(1)(d)(ii) read with Section 15 of PC Act, it is necessary to establish that a public servant has attempted to obtain for himself or for any other person any....
Court should not normally take upon itself the responsibility of comparing the disputed signature with that of the admitted signature or handwriting and in the event of the slightest doubt, leave the....
The prosecution must establish beyond a reasonable doubt the elements of cheating and conspiracy, including dishonest intent and the specific role of accused in the alleged fraud.
(1) It is not the law that where there is any infirmity or lacuna in prosecution case, same could be cured or supplied by a false defence or a plea which is not accepted by a Court. Supposition, surm....
The opinion of a Handwriting Expert must be corroborated by independent evidence, and the abuse of a public servant's position to obtain a valuable thing for another person constitutes criminal misco....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that suspicion cannot replace proof beyond reasonable doubt. The prosecution must prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, and the trial court must ....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
