ORDER :

1. The petitioners have challenged the order passed by the Learned Additional Sessions Judge, Raipur in Criminal Revision No. 211 of 2013 whereby the revision preferred by the petitioners was dismissed.

2. A complaint case was filed by respondent No. 2 against the petitioners and two other persons, namely, Nagendra Kumar Dadsena and Dr. Manju Sinha under Section 200 of the Cr.P.C. alleging therein commission of offence punishable under Sections 494, 191 and 120B read with Section 34 of the IPC. The allegations made against the accused persons were that the complainant/respondent no. 2 was married to Nagendra Dadsena on 18.5.2006 in presence of other accused persons and there is one daughter out of their wedlock. During existence of first marriage, Nagendra Dadsena performed marriage with Dr. Manju Sinha at Arya Samaj Mandir, Raipur in presence of present petitioners where they signed a declaration form as witnesses on 11.5.2011 whereas, they were aware about the fact that the first wife of Nagendra Dadsena is still alive and marriage between them has not been dissolved. On such complaint, the statement of witnesses was recorded and thereafter, learned trial Court took cogniza