Back
GOUTAM BHADURI, SANJAY S. AGRAWAL
Bhagwanti Bai W/o Kalthan Sarthi – Appellant
Versus
State Of Chhattisgarh – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Goutam Bhaduri, J.
1. This present appeal is against the impugned judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 11.02.2020 passed by the Seventh Additional Sessions Judge, Ambikapur, District Surguja in Sessions Trial No.115/2017, whereby the appellant has been convicted and sentenced as below:-
CONVICTION SENTENCE
Under Section 302 of the IPC Life Imprisonment and fine of Rs.200/-, and in default of payment of fine, additional R.I. for three months
2. The prosecution case, in brief, is that the complainant Purnima Sarthi had lodged a report on 23.07.2017 that when she along with her husband-deceased were sleeping at their house, at 11 PM, she saw that her husband was being assaulted by her mother-in-law Bhagwanti Bai on his head and having seen the assault, she fled away from the place of occurrence. Due to assault, her husband fell unconscious. Thereafter, she went to her relative-Ravindra and Gajadhar, Uncle-inlaw and thereafter, injured husband was taken to the hospital at Lakhanpur and after that, he was referred to District Hospital at Ambikapur. The injured was then admitted to the Mission Hospital, Ambikapur and eventually, he was referred to hospital at Raipur.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the standard of proof 'beyond reasonable doubt' required for conviction in criminal cases.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for conclusive evidence to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt, especially in cases based on circumstantial evidence.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the court's interpretation of the accused's mental state and the plea of insanity in relation to the commission of the crime. The court also emphas....
The absence of a satisfactory explanation from the accused, along with consistent witness statements and incriminating evidence, can lead to a conviction. Additionally, the court applied the paramete....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the application of Section 34 of the IPC and the principles of joint liability, emphasizing the requirement of common intention and community of pu....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the application of legal principles from the cases of Arjun vs. State of Chhattisgarh and Arumugam v. State to determine the categorization of t....
The main legal point established is that the appellant's actions did not qualify as a sudden provocation under Exception 1 to Section 300 IPC, as the deceased did not provoke the appellant and the ap....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
