Back
RAJANI DUBEY
Sushil Kumar Sahu, S/o. Lachhu Ram Sahu – Appellant
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Public Works Department, Raipur (C. G. ) – Respondent
ORDER :
1. The petitioner has filed the instant under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking following relief(s) :-
2. That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for the entire records pertaining tot he regularization of the petitioners.
3. That, the Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to grant any other relief which is deem fit and proper.”
2. Brief facts of the case, as projected by the petitioner, are that on 01.07.1996, the petitioner was appointed on the post of Driver on daily wages and since then he has been discharging his duty with utmost satisfaction. According to the petitioner, the respondent authorities without affording any opportunity of hearing and without any notice, all of a sudden, by oral order terminated the services of the petitioner. Thereafter, the petitioner made a representation (Annexure P/1) before the respondent authorities for supply of copy of removal order, however, th
Discriminatory denial of regularization and violation of Article 14 of the Constitution of India
The main legal point established in the judgment is that reinstated daily wagers are eligible for regularization in accordance with the circular dated 5.3.2008, and the respondent authorities must de....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
