SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Chh) 708

RAJANI DUBEY
Virendra Kumar Chanakya S/o Ratiram – Appellant
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Shakti Raj Sinha.
For the Respondents: Meena Shastri, Amrito Das.

ORDER :

1. The petitioner has preferred the present writ petition praying for the following reliefs:

    “10.1 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for the entire record of departmental enquiry concern in the case of the petitioner which led to the passing of the order dated 12.05.2015.

10.2 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to set aside the Order No. 4407/1352/XXI-B/C.G./15 dated 12.05.2015 passed by Government of Chhattisgarh, Law & Legislative Affairs Department, Mantralaya, Raipur, and order no 8450/ Comp./2015 dated 16/October/2015, in the interest of justice

10.3 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to reinstate the petitioner back in judicial service, in the interest of justice.

10.4 Any other reliefs which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit to grant in the facts and circumstances of this case.”

2. Brief facts of the case are that the petitioner was serving under the respondents as a member of judicial service. The petitioner was lastly posted as Chief Judicial Magistrate Dantewada (C.G.). During the service of the petitioner, when he was serving as Chief Judicial Magistrate Dantewada, Bastar (C.G.) a written complaint was made by unknown person a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top