IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
ARVIND SINGH CHANDEL, J.
B.B. Verma, S/o Shri Maniram Verma – Appellant
versus
State of Chhattisgarh through Secretary, Agriculture Department - Respondent
Writ Petition (S) No.5471 of 2020
Decided on : 14-12-2023
Gratuity - Pension Rules - Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Rule 9, Rule 64 - The court discussed the provisions of Rule 9 and Rule 64 of the Pension Rules and their applicability to the case. It highlighted that the rules entitle the employee to receive 50% of gratuity even if a judicial proceeding is pending, and directed the Respondents to grant 50% of the gratuity to the Petitioner.
Fact of the Case:
The Petitioner, a Senior Agriculture Development Officer, retired and was convicted under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The authorities decided not to pay the gratuity due to the pending criminal appeal.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the Petitioner is entitled to receive 50% of his gratuity even with the pending criminal appeal, as per the provisions of the Pension Rules.
Issues: The issue was whether the Petitioner is entitled to receive gratuity despite the pending criminal appeal.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the provisions of Rule 9 and Rule 64 of the Pension Rules entitle the employee to receive 50% of gratuity even if a judicial proceeding is pending.
Final Decision: The court directed the Respondents to grant 50% of the gratuity to the Petitioner within one month from the receipt of the order.
ORDER :
1. The instant petition has been moved by the Petitioner being aggrieved by the orders dated 9.1.2019 (Annexure P1) and dated 7.5.2019 (Annexure P2), whereby the Respondents authorities have decided not to pay the amount of gratuity to the Petitioner for the reason that an appeal, being Criminal Appeal No.28 of 2018 of the Petitioner against the order of conviction by the Special Judge under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (henceforth ‘the PC Act’) is pending before this Court.
2. Facts of the case, in short, are that the Petitioner while working as a Senior Agriculture Development Officer retired on 31.8.2018. He has been implicated in a bribe case for which the Petitioner has been convicted by the Special Judge under the PC Act, Bilaspur on 27.12.2017. Against the said order of conviction, an appeal, being Criminal Appeal No.28 of 2018 has been moved by the Petitioner before this Court which is pending. After his retirement since the Petitioner did not receive any amount of gratuity, he made an application for payment of gratuity as well as for full pensionary benefits. Till date, the Petitioner has not received any gratuity amount. Respondents No.2 and 3 rejected the claim of the Petitioner on account of pendency of the criminal case before this Court. Hence, the instant petition.
3. It is submitted by Learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner that vide order dated 7.5.2019 (Annexure P2) claim of the Petitioner has been rejected invoking the provisions of Rule 64(1)(c) of the Chhattisgarh Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1976 (henceforth ‘the Pension Rules’), which is not applicable in the case of the Petitioner. According to Learned Counsel, in the light of sub-rule (4) of Rule 9 read with sub-rule (1)(a) of Rule 64 of the Pension Rules, the Petitioner is entitled to get 50% of his gratuity which will be adjusted against final retirement benefit sanctioned to him later on. Therefore, it is prayed by the Learned Counsel that the Respondents may be directed accordingly.
4. Learned Counsel appearing for the Respondents/State opposes the arguments advanced by Learned Counsel for the Petitioner and submits that since a criminal proceeding is already pending against the Petitioner, the impugned order has rightly been passed.
5. I have heard the rival contentions put-forth on behalf of the parties and perused the entire material available including the documents filed with due care.
6. Undisputedly, the Petitioner has retired from service on 31.8.2018. Before that, on 27.12.2017, he has been convicted by the Special Judge under the PC Act, Bilaspur against which a criminal appeal, being Criminal Appeal No.28 of 2018 has been preferred by the Petitioner which is pending before this Court. Meaning thereby, the judicial proceeding against the Petitioner is still going on.
7. It would be appropriate to reproduce some of the relevant provisions of the Pension Rules, which read as under:
xxxxxx xxxxx xxxxx
(4) In the case of a Government servant who has retired on attaining the age of superannuation or otherwise and against whom any departmental or judicial proceedings are instituted or where departmental proceedings are continued under sub-rule (2), a provisional pension and death-cum-retirement gratuity as provided in Rule 64, as the case may be, shall be sanctioned;
xxxxx xxxxx xxxxx
64. Provisional pension where departmental or judicial proceeding may be pending.—(1) (a) In respect of Government servants refer to in sub-rule (4) of Rule 9 the Head of Office shall authorise the payment of provisional pension not exceeding the maximum pension and 50% of gratuity taking into consideration the gravity of charges levelled against such Government servant, which would have been admissible on the basis of qualifying service up to the date of retirement of the Government servant or if he was under suspension on the date of retirement, up to the date immediately preceding the date
The main legal point established is that an employee is entitled to receive 50% of gratuity even if a judicial proceeding is pending, as per the provisions of the Pension Rules.
The main legal point established is that under Rule 43(c) of the Bihar Pension Rule, 1950, employees facing departmental inquiry or judicial proceeding at the time of superannuation are entitled to p....
Gratuity cannot be withheld solely due to a pending criminal case as per the Bihar Pension Rule, 1950 Rule 43(c) and the judgment in Arvind Kumar Singh Vs State of Bihar and Ors 2018 (II) PLJR 933.
Entitlement to full pension and gratuity is dependent on the absence of pending judicial or departmental proceedings at the time of retirement, as per the Chhattisgarh Civil Services (Pension) Rules,....
Gratuity payment can be withheld during the pendency of departmental or judicial proceedings as per Rule 64(1)(c) of the Chhattisgarh Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1976.
The conclusion of both departmental and judicial proceedings is necessary for the release of gratuity as per clause-C of Rule 69 of the CCS Pension Rules.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.