IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
RAMESH SINHA, C.J. SACHIN SINGH RAJPUT, J.
Nand Kishor Raj, son of Shri Virendra Kishore Raj – Appellant
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh - Respondent
W.P. (PIL) No.13 of 2024
Decided on : 28-06-2024
Tender - Multi Level Car Parking - Chhattisgarh Municipal Corporation (Transfer of Immovable Property) Rules, 1994 - Rule 8
Fact of the Case:
The Bilaspur Smart City Limited planned to build a Multi Level Car Parking Building in the main market of Bilaspur and later decided to convert the ground floor into 46 shops. The Petitioners sought to quash the tender notice and subsequent proceedings for allotment of shops, citing violations of the Rules of 1994 and fire safety concerns.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the respondent failed to abide by Rule 8 of the Rules of 1994 and that the defense of scarcity of funds was not acceptable. The court set aside the allotment made by the respondent and directed adherence to the reservation criteria as per Rule 8. The court also ordered a fire and safety audit of the Multi Level Car Parking.
Issues: Violation of Rule 8 of the Rules of 1994, fire safety concerns, and the legality of the allotment of shops in the Multi Level Car Parking.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the respondent's failure to adhere to Rule 8 and the defense of scarcity of funds were not acceptable. It emphasized the importance of reservation criteria and safety measures in such projects.
Final Decision: The court allowed the writ petition, set aside the allotment made by the respondent, directed adherence to Rule 8 for future allotments, and ordered a fire and safety audit of the Multi Level Car Parking.
ORDER
Ramesh Sinha, J.
1. By the instant petition, the Petitioners seek the following reliefs:
“1. That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for the entire records pertaining to the construction of multilevel parking and calling of tender for allotment of shop.
2. That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ/Order/Direction to quash the impugned tender notice and subsequent proceedings issued for allotment of shops in the multilevel car parking.
3. That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ/Order/Direction to conduct a Fire and Safety Audit for the Building Complex before allotting the shops.
4. That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ/Order/Direction to the Board of Directors of the Bilaspur Smart City Limited to implement reservation criteria as provided in Rule 8 of the Chhattisgarh Municipal Corporation (Transfer of Immovable Property) Rules, 1994, while implementing the object of the impugned tender.
5. That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ/Order/Direction to Department of Home to constitute a Higher Power Committee in the Chairman any farmer DGP of the State to assess the security concern in a time bound manner due to construction of multilevel car parking building in the City Kotwali Premises.
6. That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ/Order/Direction to implement such security measures which may be suggested by the High Power Committee for addressing the security concern of the police station and if the same could not be remedied then demolish the structure.
7. That, this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to pass any other order/relief that this Hon’ble Court may please deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case including grant of cost of the instant litigation.”
2. Facts of the case, in brief, are that the Respondent 3/Bilaspur Smart City Limited (BSCL) made a plan to build a Multi Level Car Parking Building in the main market of Bilaspur and identified the land of Home Department situated in the premises of City Kotwali Police Station, Bilaspur. Initially, the Home Department was averse to the idea of allowing a multi storied construction in the police station premises and as per media information the Inspector General of Police had even objected to the same. However, later, the construction was conceded to and demand of the BSCL was allowed for the construction of car parking. The design, map and construction, everything was done for the creation of a multi level car parking. However, at much later stage, an idea of converting the ground floor of the same into 46 shops came in the mind of the officials of the BSCL. For converting the ground floor of the car parking building, walls have been erected in the manner that it has completely blocked the ventilation of the building. Moreover, the shops have been created by erecting steel divider which clearly shows that the building complex has not been designed and built as a shopping-cum-car parking complex, but, merely as a car parking building. No light and air is coming and thus the building has become very risky in terms of fire hazards. No map has been approved showing 46 shops in the complex (Annexure P1). The BSCL invited a tender on 9.2.2024 for allotment of shops in the City Kotwali Multi Level Car Parking. As per the schedule programme, last date for submission of the application for the same was 24.2.2024 5:00 p.m., whereas the last date for submission of tender (financial bid) (Annexure P2) was mentioned as 4:00 p.m. of 27.2.2024. The submitted bid was to be opened by 5:15 p.m. of 28.2.2024. The terms and conditions attached with the said tender form clearly state that the BSCL is an organisation for the time being whereas after its dissolution all assets and liabilities would belong to the Municipal Corporation Bilaspur. The said terms and conditions show that there is n
Cherukuri Mani v. Chief Secretary, Government of Andhra Pradesh & Ors.
Chandra Kishore Jha v. Mahavir Prasad & Ors.
Janhit Abhiyan Vs. Union of India (EWS Reservation
Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay (MCGM) Vs. Abhilash Lal & others
Nazir Ahmad v. King Emperor [(1935- 36) 63 IA 372 : AIR 1936 PC 253 (II)
Rao Shiv Bahadur Singh v. State of V.P. [AIR 1954 SC 322 : 1954 SCR 1098]
State of U.P. v. Singhara Singh [AIR 1964 SC 358 : (1964) 1 SCWR 57].
AI
Adherence to statutory requirements, such as reservation criteria, and the importance of safety measures in construction projects.
Irregular allotment of SC/ST reserved property without following prescribed procedures leads to illegality; strict adherence to government provisions necessitated for future allotments.
Writ petitions can be maintained against administrative actions affecting contracts, especially when principles of natural justice and public policy are at stake.
Entitlement to challenge allotment requires demonstrating displacement due to construction.
The court emphasized the importance of planned development and the need to address unauthorized constructions. It also highlighted the right of the petitioners, as owners, to be heard before the orde....
The court mandated that reservation laws for elections must prioritize women in the Scheduled Caste category to ensure compliance with statutory requirements and support gender justice.
The A.P. Building Rules 2017 do not specify that parking space should be either in the stilt or in the cellar only as per the application and permission obtained.
Cancelled permition for construction - Quashment of - As per Rule 56(2) rear open space in back should be 1.5m for building up to 10m height and there shall be an increase of rear open space at the r....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.