NARENDRA KUMAR VYAS
Vishnu Pratap Singh, S/o. Late Prasanath Singh – Appellant
Versus
Mukteshwar Rai, S/o. Sankatha Rai – Respondent
ORDER :
1. The petitioner/plaintiff has filed the present writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India assailing the order dated 9-9-2019 (Annexure P/1) passed in Civil Suit No 91-A/2016 by the 4th Additional District Judge, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur by which the application under Section 65 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (for short, “the Act, 1872”) filed by the petitioner/plaintiff to examine the photo copy of the agreement dated 17-5-1991 as secondary evidence has been rejected.
2. The brief facts as reflected from the record are that the petitioner/plaintiff had filed a civil suit for declaration, title and grant of permanent injunction relating to the property situated at village Bodri, Patwari Halka No.1, Tahsil Belha, District Bilaspur bearing Khasra No. 279 and 280 and Khasra No 15 total area 4.26 acres of land. It has been contended that the plaintiff along with defendants No.1 and 2 had agreed to purchase the land bearing Khasra No. 279/3 and 280/3 area 3.81 acres situated at village Bodri, Patwari Halka No.1, Tahsil Belha, District Bilaspur, but the defendant No.1 was not having sufficient money to meet the expenses of registry, therefore, the defendant
United India Assurance Company Limited vs. Anbari and others
H. Siddiqui (dead) By Legal Representatives vs. A. Ramalingam
Rajesh Mohindra vs. Anita Beri and others
Jagmail Singha and another vs. Karamit Singh and others
The Roman Catholilc Mission & Anr. v. The State of Madras & Anr.
State of Rajasthan & Ors. v. Khemraj & Ors.
Life Insurance Corporation of India & Anr. v. Ram Pal Singh Bisen
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.