IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
RAMESH SINHA, CJ., RAVINDRA KUMAR AGRAWAL, J.
Bandhuram Kanwar, S/o. Gendaram Kanwar and Ors. - Appellants
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh, Through Station House Officer, Police Station- Balconagar, Dist. - Korba - Respondent
CRA No. 13 of 2022
Decided On : 03-04-2024
Conviction - Criminal Appeal - CrPC - Sections 460, 323, 325, 302/34 of the IPC - Summary of Acts and Sections: The court discussed the evidentiary value of interested witnesses, the need for deep scrutiny, and the credibility of eyewitnesses who are relatives of the deceased. The court also highlighted the importance of corroborative evidence and motive in establishing guilt. The judgment references key legal provisions such as the Indian Penal Code and the Code of Criminal Procedure, and their interpretations influenced the court's decision.
Fact of the Case:
The case involved the homicidal death of Bablu Rathiya and assault on his wife and neighbor. The prosecution presented evidence from eyewitnesses and medical reports to establish the guilt of the accused. The defense argued lack of direct evidence and motive to implicate the appellants.
Finding of the Court:
The court found the appellants guilty based on the evidence provided by the eyewitnesses and corroborative witness, as well as the established motive. The court emphasized the need for deep scrutiny of the evidence and the credibility of the eyewitnesses who were relatives of the deceased.
Issues: The key issues included the evidentiary value of interested witnesses, the need for deep scrutiny, and the establishment of motive in the commission of the crime.
Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was influenced by the evidentiary value of interested witnesses, the need for deep scrutiny, and the importance of establishing motive in the commission of the crime.
Final Decision: The criminal appeal filed on behalf of the appellants was dismissed, and the appellants were ordered to serve out the sentence as ordered by the trial court.
JUDGMENT :
Ramesh Sinha, CJ.
1. This criminal appeal under Section 374(2) of the CrPC is directed against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 20.12.2021 passed by the learned Special Judge under Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, Korba in Sessions Trial No.27/2018, whereby the learned Sessions Judge has convicted and sentenced the appellants in the following manner with a direction to run all the sentences concurrently.
| CONVICTION | SENTENCE |
| U/s 460 of the IPC | RI for 5-5 years and fine of Rs.1000-1000/- and in default of payment of fine amount, additional RI for 1-1 month to each of the appellants. |
| U/s 323 of the IPC | RI for 6-6 months and fine of Rs.200-200/- and in default of payment of fine amount, additional RI for 7-7 days to each of the appellants. |
| U/s 325 of the IPC | RI for 2-2 years and fine of Rs.500-500/- and in default of payment of fine amount, additional RI for 15-15 days to each of the appellants. |
| U/s 302/34 of the IPC | Life Imprisonment and fine of Rs.2000-2000/- and in default of payment of fine amount, additional RI for 2-2 months to each of the appellants. |
2. Case of the prosecution, in brief, is that on 04.12.2017 one Kumari Pramila Rathiya lodged a report (Dehati Nalsi) Ex.P/1, as per which her cousin brother Bablu @ Bahattar Rathiya lived in village Gahniya with his wife in their in-laws house. It is stated that in the morning at about 4 am she was informed that her brother and sister-in-law along with one neighbor Aghni Bai were sleeping in the house then some unknown persons entered into house and assaulted them. It is further stated that all the injured were taken to hospital where the brother Bablu died due to grievous injuries on head and Bablu’s wife Ram Kumari and neighbor Aghni Bai were also assaulted over their head with stick or rod with intention to cause kill them, who are admitted in the District Hospital, Korba. Bablu’s death was also due to causing serious injury by hitting with a stick or rod with the intention of killing. On the basis of Dehati Nalsi (Ex.P-1), Dehati Merg Intimation was recorded vide Ex.P-2, on the basis of which, Merg Intimation was record vide Ex.P-38 and thereafter First Information Report bearing Crime No. 312/2017 was registered under Sections 458, 302, 307 of the IPC against unknown persons vide Ex.P-39.
3. Medical examination of the victims Ram Kumari and Aghani Bai was done. After summoning the witnesses vide Ex.P-5, inquest over the dead body of the deceased was prepared and postmorterm of the body of the deceased was conducted by Dr.R.P.S. Paikra (PW-14) and postmortem report was given vide Ex.P-7, who found following injuries over the dead body of the deceased :
(ii) Lacerated wound over the left fronto-temporal bone 16 x 1.5 cm.
(iii) Black in colour over the left should 15 x 8 cm.
He opined that the cause of death is cardio respiratory failure due to head injury and the nature of death is antemortem and homicidal in nature.
4. During investigation, spot map was prepared vide Ex.P-28 Bloodstained saree and blouse of the injured Ram Kumari was seized vide Ex.P-3. Statements of injured Ram Kumari and Aghani Bai were recorded by Exs.D-1 and D-2 and on the basis of statement of injured Ram Kumari (Ex.D-1), the appellants were taken into custody and memorandum statements of accused/appellants Bandhuram Kanwar, Hol Say Kanwar and Nan Singh Korwa were recorded vide Exs.P-13, P-14 and P-15 respectively and on the basis of their memorandum statements, one axe was recovered at the instance of accused Bandhuram Kanwar vide Ex.P-16; one iron rod with bloodstains was recovered at the instance of accused Hol Say Kanwar vide Ex.P- 17 and one another iron rod with bloodstains was recovered at the instance of accused Nan Singh Korwa vide Ex.P-18, th
Guman Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan
Taijuddin Vs. State of Assam & Others
Dalip Singh and others v. The State of Punjab
Ramanand Yadav v. Prabhu Nath Jha and others
Mst. Dalbir Kaur and others v. State of Punjab reported in AIR 1977 SC 472
The judgment emphasizes the importance of scrutinizing the evidence provided by interested witnesses, establishing motive, and the need for corroborative evidence in criminal cases.
The judgment establishes that the prosecution must prove its case beyond a reasonable doubt, particularly when relying on eyewitness testimony, which must be consistent and credible to support a conv....
The court reiterated the importance of scrutinizing testimony from interested witnesses, considering the relevance of motive in establishing guilt, and disregarding minor discrepancies in witness tes....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for the testimony of a sole eyewitness to be wholly reliable and corroborated by other evidence, failing which the accused may be e....
Interested witnesses, such as close relatives of the deceased, can provide credible testimony and their evidence should be carefully scrutinized but not automatically discarded. In cases of direct ev....
Eyewitness testimony from injured relatives is credible and can support a conviction, provided it is consistent and corroborated by medical evidence.
Witness testimonies cannot be discarded solely due to their relation to the victim; evidence must be considered on credibility and context, with mitigating factors influencing sentencing.
Conviction for mass murder under 302/149 IPC set aside due to unreliable, contradictory ocular evidence from related witnesses; doubtful night identification, improbable presence/story; benefit of do....
The prosecution must prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt, and discrepancies in witness testimonies can lead to acquittal.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.