Back
RAKESH MOHAN PANDEY
Meena Rai D/o N. P. Ray – Appellant
Versus
Neeta D/o Seeta Ram Prasad – Respondent
ORDER :
Rakesh Mohan Pandey, J.
1. The present appeal has been filed against the judgment and decree passed by the VIIIth Additional District Judge, FTC Durg (C.G. in Civil Suit No.33-B/2003 dated 30.09.2008 wherein and whereby, the civil suit filed by the plaintiff was decreed and the defendant/appellant was directed to make payment of Rs.80,000/- with interest at the rate of 6% per annum. It is also observed that the suit was dismissed for want of prosecution on 25.08.2005 and it was restored on 15.06.2007, therefore, the plaintiff would not be entitled to get interest for that period.
2. The plaintiff filed a suit for recovery of Rs.80,000/- with interest @ 18% per annum on the ground that a loan of Rs.1,00,000/- was advanced to the defendant and agreement Ex.P/1 was executed between the plaintiff and defendant on 08.09.1995 in presence of two witnesses, namely, Mahipat Singh and D.N. Tiwari. A stamp paper of Rs.10/- was purchased by the defendant herself on 06.09.1995. The agreement would reveal that an amount of Rs.20,000/- was refunded by the defendant to the plaintiff on 25.03.1997. The back-leaf of the stamp paper was signed by the plaintiff in the presence of two witnesses bu
An acknowledgment of payment must contain the debtor's signature to extend the limitation period; otherwise, the suit is barred by limitation.
The acknowledgment of debt for limitation purposes must be explicit, written, and made before the expiration of the limitation period; mere disputes do not suffice.
A party seeking recovery under a promissory note must prove the validity of the note; failure to substantiate an endorsement leads to claims being barred by limitation.
An acknowledgment of debt must be in writing and signed to extend the limitation period; unsigned entries are legally insufficient.
(1) Once signature in promissory note is admitted, presumption would go to support execution of Pronote.(2) Stamp paper purchased by or for use of a person, can be used by that person or his legal re....
Sale agreements must comply with statutory requirements, including proper execution and stamping; failure to demonstrate consensus or readiness negates claims for specific performance.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that admissions by the parties and the authenticity of documents play a crucial role in determining liability for loan repayment.
The court established that the limitation period for recovery of loans starts from the date of the loan agreement, with the first day excluded in the computation.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
