SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Chh) 42

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR 
ARVIND KUMAR VERMA, J.
Lokesh Agrawal S/o Shri Radha Kishan Agrawal – Appellant 
Versus
The State Of Chhattisgarh Through Police Station Kotwali, Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh - Respondent 
CRMP No. 611, 615, 632 of 2021 
Decided on : 21-3-2025


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Parag Kotecha, Advocate
For the Respondent:Ms. Pragya Shrivastava, Dy. G.A. Mr. Rakesh Kumar Thakur, Advocate

Cancellation of bail requires cogent circumstances; mere allegations are insufficient without substantial evidence.

Headnote:

(A) Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Section 439(2) - Cancellation of bail - Petitioner sought cancellation of bail granted to respondents on grounds of cheating and non-compliance with agreement - The trial court overlooked the gravity of the offence and the potential for witness tampering. (Paras 2, 3, 4, 9)

(B) Bail Cancellation - The Supreme Court in Dolat Ram and Hazari Lal Das established that cancellation requires cogent circumstances and should not be done mechanically. (Paras 7, 8)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner alleged that respondents received a substantial amount but failed to comply with the agreement, leading to claims of cheating. The matter is under investigation for potential additional charges.

Findings of Court:
The court found no substantial reason or supervening circumstances to warrant the cancellation of bail.

Issues: The main issues were whether the trial court properly considered the gravity of the offence and the potential for witness tampering.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the trial court's decision to grant bail was justified based on the totality of the facts, and no prima facie case for cancellation was established.

Result: Petitions dismissed.

Order :

(Arvind Kumar Verma, J.)

1. Since all the petitions are arising out of common order they are being heard and decided by this common order.

2. These petitions have been preferred by the petitioner under Section 439(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure to allow the petitions and reject the bail orders granted to respondents- Dhirendra Kumar Sharma, Narendra Kumar Sharma, Rajendra Kumar Sharma, Smt. Sunita Sharma and Koushal Kishore Sharma by order dated 15.06.2021 passed in Crime No.312 of 2021 by the learned 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Rajnandgaon (C.G.).

3. Relevant facts for disposal of these petitions are that the present application is cancellation of the bail of the respondents. The petitioner had paid Rs. 1,60,71,250 (Rupees One Corer Sixty Lakhs seventy one thousand and two hundred and fifty) to the respondents and co-owner of the property and admittedly the amount was received by the respondents and co-owner, but the respondents have cheated the petitioner by not complying their part of agreement and file an application and taken the order of partition. Further documents which was provided to the petitioner like PAN Card, B1, names and surname are different, so from the inception of agreement, the respondents have an intention to cheat the petitioner and grab huge amount. The matter is under investigation and during investigation, various other Sections will be added against the respondents. This aspect had totally been overlooked by the learned trial Court and granted anticipatory bail to the respondents. Hence, these petitions.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner contended that looking to the gravity of offence, which has been caused by respondents, bail order of the respondents is liable to be rejected. He further contended that only on the presumption and assumption, the application under Section 439 of Cr. P.C. was allowed without considering the material fact, by the learned trial Court. He further contended that the learned Session Judge had nothing discussed nothing on merits of the matter and without discussing the allegation levelled against the respondents, had granted the bail. He further contended that the matter is still under investigation and there is every chance during the investigation that an offence under Sections 406, 467, 468 and 471 IPC and other Section of Indian Penal Code will also be registered against the accused persons. It is also contended that the learned lower court has not considered that there is reasonable apprehension of tampering of the witness and the discretion exercise by the learned lower court in non-judicious manner and the order pass is in such a causal manner and same is liable to be set aside. It is therefore, humbly and most respectfully prays that the Hon'ble court may kindly pleased to quash/set aside the order dated 15/06/2021 and other relief may be granted, which the Court deems fit under the facts and circumstance of the case.

5. On the other hand, learned counsel for the respondents submits that the order passed by the learned trial Court is just and proper needs no interference.

6. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record with utmost circumspection.

7. On the issue with regard to rejection of bail and cancellation of bail already granted, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, in the matter of Dolat Ram and others Vs. State of Haryana reported in (1995) 1 SCC 349, has held in para 4, which reads as under:-

“4. Rejection of bail in a non-bailable case at the initial stage and the cancellation of bail so granted, have to be considered and dealt with on different basis. Very cogent and overwhelming circumstances are necessary for an order directing the cancellation of the bail, already granted. Generally speaking, the grounds for cancellation of bail, broadly (illustrative and not exhaustive) are : interference or attempt to interfere with the due course of administration of justice or evasion or attempt to evade the due cours

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top