SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Chh) 80

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR 
SHRI RAMESH SINHA, CHIEF JUSTICE, SHRI RAVINDRA KUMAR AGRAWAL, JUDGE
Nabin Manjhi S/o Late Rama Manjhi - Appellant 
Versus 
State of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer - Respondent
CRA No. 1934 of 2023 
Decided on : 05-03-2025


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Virendra Verma, Advocate
For the Respondent: Mr. Shailendra Sharma, Panel Lawyer

The prosecution must prove possession of narcotics beyond reasonable doubt, and procedural lapses do not automatically invalidate a conviction if credible evidence supports the case.

Headnote:

(A) Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Section 374(2) - Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Section 20(b)(ii)

(C) - Conviction for illegal possession of narcotic substance - Appellant sentenced to 11 years of rigorous imprisonment and fine for transporting 40.980 kg of ganja - Prosecution established possession through procedural compliance despite issues with independent witnesses. (Paras 2, 38, 41)

(B) Evidence - Burden of proof - The prosecution must prove its case beyond reasonable doubt; however, police testimony can establish possession if credible. (Paras 12, 14, 40)

Facts of the case:
The appellant was convicted for transporting ganja in a vehicle, with the prosecution relying on police evidence and procedural adherence despite hostile independent witnesses. (Paras 2, 12)

Findings of Court:
The trial court's judgment was affirmed as it was based on proper evidence appreciation, and procedural lapses did not vitiate the conviction. (Paras 38, 41)

Issues: The primary issues were whether the prosecution proved possession beyond reasonable doubt and whether procedural compliance under the NDPS Act was sufficient. (Paras 9, 30)

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that non-compliance with certain provisions does not automatically invalidate a conviction if the prosecution presents credible evidence establishing possession and compliance with other procedural norms. (Paras 30, 34)

Result: Appeal dismissed; conviction and sentence affirmed.

Judgment :

(Ramesh Sinha, CJ.)

1. Today, though the matter is listed for hearing on I.A.No. 02/2023, which is an application for suspension of sentence and grant of bail to the appellant, however, with the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the appeal is heard finally.

2. The present appeal has been filed by the appellant under Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973, (for short the, Cr.P.C.) against the impugned judgment of conviction and sentence dated 17.07.2023, passed by learned Special Judge under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Sustances Act, Kawardha, District - Kabirdham (C.G.) in Special Criminal Case under the NDPS Act No. 403/2020 whereby the learned Special Judge has convicted the appellant for the offence under Section 20(b)(ii)(C) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as “the NDPS Act”) and sentenced him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 11 years with fine of Rs.1,00,000/- in default of payment of fine, additional R.I. for one year.

3. The prosecution case, in brief, is that on 01-02-2020, Assistant Sub-Inspector Panchram Verma posted at Police Station Chilpi received information from an informer that the driver of a Ford Fiesta car number CG-04 DR-9700 was illegally transporting narcotic substance ganja from Raipur to Jabalpur on Raipur-Jabalpur Highway NH-30 Main Road. On finding out that the said informer’s information was reliable, witnesses were summoned by making an entry in Diary Sanha No. 19 Ex.P.-32 about the information. Constable No. 763 Hridayesh Singh was served notice and sent to Chilpi town to bring witnesses Mahendra Das Manikpuri and Jot Dharwaiya along with him. Constable No. 763 Hridayesh Singh served notice to witnesses Mahendra Das Manikpuri and Jot Dharwaiya and brought them to the police station. Witnesses Mahendra Das Manikpuri and Jot Dharwaiya were made aware of the informer's information and an informer's panchnama Ex.P.-02 and a panchnama Ex.P.-03 for not being able to obtain search warrant were prepared in their presence. Constable No. 115 Kaushal Dindore was issued a duty certificate Ex.P.-26 and under Section 42 of the NDPS Act, the SDOP office Bodla was informed about the informer's information and to be present at the spot. Thereafter the investigator along with constables and witnesses along with the investigation material went in front of Chilpi police station for raid whose dispatch was recorded in the police station's diary number-23 Ex.P.-36.

4. A blockade was put up on both sides of the main road NH-30 in front of the police station. After some time, a Ford Fiesta car bearing registration number CG-04 DR-9700 was seen coming from Bodla as per the information provided by the informer. It was stopped and the name and address of the person inside the vehicle was asked. The suspect in the vehicle was made aware of the information provided by the informer and a consent form for the search Ex.P.-04 was prepared in front of witnesses and on obtaining the consent, a consent panchnama Ex.P.-05 was prepared in front of witnesses. The accused travelling in the vehicle was made aware of the informer's information in front of witnesses and before searching the accused, the investigator got himself and his accompanying staff searched. No objectionable material was found in the said search. Then, when the said vehicle Ford Fiesta car number CG-04 DR-9700 in the possession of the accused was searched as per the proper vehicle search panchnama Ex.P. 10 under the NDPS Act, a total of 40 packets of ganja-like narcotic substance wrapped in khaki coloured tape were found in a box made behind the rear seat of the vehicle and in the rear trunk of the car, which were recovered as per the recovery panchnama Ex.P.-11. The 40 recovered packets were opened and a small quantity of substance was taken out from them and on examining it by looking, smelling, rubbing and burning in small quantity, it was found to be ganja and a narcotic su

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top