HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
SHRI RAMESH SINHA, CJ. RAVINDRA KUMAR AGRAWAL, J.
Sheikh Saleem S/o. Sheikh Kareem - Appellant
versus
State Of Chhattisgarh Through P.S. Kotwali, District – Respondent
CRA No. 1530 of 2024, CRA No. 1798, 1800 of 2024
Decided on : 25-03-2025
(A) Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Section 374(2) - Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 302 and 324 - Criminal appeals against conviction for murder and causing injuries - Appellants convicted for murder and sentenced to life imprisonment and fines - Evidence from eyewitnesses established the unlawful assembly and common intention to commit murder - Conviction upheld with modification to include Section 302/149 IPC. (Paras 2, 28, 36)
(B) Eyewitness Testimony - The credibility of eyewitnesses, particularly those related to the victim, must be assessed based on consistency and reliability rather than familial ties alone. (Paras 24, 26)
Facts of the case:
The appellants attacked the deceased and others with weapons after a prior altercation regarding local disturbances, resulting in the death of Parvez Qureshi and injuries to others. (Paras 3, 5)
Findings of Court:
The trial court's finding of homicide was affirmed, and the appellants were found guilty of murder under Section 302/149 IPC. (Paras 16, 36)
Issues: Whether the death was homicidal and whether the appellants were part of an unlawful assembly committing murder. (Paras 15, 30)
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the principle of vicarious liability under Section 149 IPC, holding all members of an unlawful assembly accountable for the actions taken in furtherance of their common object. (Paras 30, 32)
Result: Appeals dismissed with modification of conviction to include Section 302/149 IPC.
Judgment :
(Ramesh Sinha, C.J.)
1. Since the aforesaid three criminal appeals have been filed against the impugned judgment dated 23.07.2024 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Rajnandgaon in Sessions Case No.21/2021, they were clubbed & heard together and being disposed of by this common judgment.
2. Appellants-Sheikh Saleem, Salman @ Vicky Khan, Kartik Ram Tembekar, Premchand @ Bittu, Mukul Netam and Simon Peter have preferred these three criminal appeals under Section 374(2) of the CrPC questioning the impugned judgment dated 23.07.2024 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Rajnandgaon in Sessions Case No.21/2021, by which they have been convicted for offences under Sections 324 (three times) and 302 of the IPC and sentenced to undergo RI for three years and fine of Rs.2000/-, in default of payment of fine to further undergo RI for one month on each count and imprisonment for life and fine of Rs.5000/-, in default of payment of fine to further undergo RI for two years.
3. Case of the prosecution, in nutshell, is that appellants Salman @ Vicky Khan, Simon Peter, Mukul Netam, Premchand @ Bittu Basphod, Kartik @ Bhau Tembekar used to sit in the square in front of Raja Sriwas’s house and consume drugs and tease the girls of the locality, therefore, Raja Sriwas and his friend Parvez Qureshi had stopped the said appellants from sitting in front of his house in January, 2020, then all the said accused had threatened to fight with Raja Sriwas and Parvez Qureshi. On 21.09.2020 at about 20:00 P.M. Raja Srivas went in his car CG-08-AM-0429 along with his driver Suraj to Station Para and picked up Pervez Qureshi and Sohail Raza bringing them to his home for dinner which they ate on the terrace. After dinner Raja Srivas escorted his guests Pervez Qureshi and Mohd. Sohail Raza out of his home to his car which was parked right in front of the home with the driver waiting inside the car. As all three were getting into the car it is alleged that the appellants came from the side of the Water Tank and started abusing Raja Srivas and attacked Pervez Qureshi who died. Raja Sriwas, his daughter Pooja Srivas and Mohd. Sohail Raza also received injuries. Thereafter, the appellants entered their house and started beating and abusing them and thereafter ran away with the weapons from the spot. Dehati nalsi and dehati merg intimation were registered by Smt.Ranjita Srivas (PW-3) vide Exs.P-1 and P-2. FIR was registered vide Ex.P-33. Inquest was prepared over the body of the deceased vide Ex.P-35. Spot map was prepared by the investigating officer vide Ex.P-3. Bloodstained soil and plain soil were recovered from the spot vide Ex.P-5. Memorandum statement of appellant Salman @ Vicky was recorded vide Ex.P-9. Memorandum statement of appellant Shaikh Salim was recorded vide Ex.P-10. Memorandum statement of appellant Kartik Tembekar was recorded vide Ex.P-11. Memorandum statement of appellant Premchand @ Billu was recorded vide Ex.P-12. Memorandum statement of appellant Simon Peter was recorded vide Ex.P-13 and memorandum statement of appellant Mukul Netam was recorded vide Ex.P-14. One sword, full paint stains with blood and t-shirt stains with blood were seized from appellant Salman Khan vide Ex.P-15. One iron rod, lower stains with blood and t-shirt stains with blood were seized from appellant Shaikh Salim vide Ex.P-16. One knife, jeans fullpant stains with blood and full shirt stains with blood were seized from appellant Kartik Tembekar vide Ex.P-17. One sword stains with blood, jeans stains with blood and full shirt stains with blood were seized from appellant Premchand Basphod vide Ex.P-18. One battle axe stains with blood, jeans stains with blood and t-shirt stains with blood were seized from appellant Simon Peter vide Ex.P-19. One sword stains with blood, jeans stains with blood and full shirt stains with blood were seized from appellant Mukul Netam vide Ex.P-20. The appellants were arrested on 22.09.2020 vide Exs.P- 21 to P-26. MLC of injured
The court affirmed the conviction of the appellants under Section 302/149 IPC for murder, emphasizing the principle of vicarious liability in unlawful assemblies.
The court affirmed the conviction for murder based on the established common object of the unlawful assembly, supported by credible witness testimonies and medical evidence.
Point of Law : Unlawful assembly – Common object - No doubt section 149 IPC is wide in its sweep but in fixing the membership of the unlawful assembly and in inferring the common object various circu....
Conviction for murder upheld based on unlawful assembly doctrine; presence in assembly sufficient for accountability under Section 149 IPC.
Conviction based on unreliable eyewitness testimonies that lack independent corroboration cannot establish guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
The court ruled that evidence from interested witnesses is credible if consistent and supported by circumstances, necessitating careful evaluation of roles in unlawful assemblies under IPC.
The court's decision in this case highlights the importance of analyzing the relevant provisions of the IPC and applying them to the facts of the case in order to determine the nature of the offense ....
In cases of unlawful assembly leading to murder, all involved members can be held vicariously liable, and eyewitness testimonies must be credible even if witnesses are related to the victim.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.