Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
NARENDRA KUMAR VYAS
Manoj Wadher, S/o. Late Shri Girdhar Lal Wadher – Appellant
Versus
Nagendra Wadher, S/o. Late Shri Girdhar Lal Wadher – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. partition dispute between siblings regarding ancestral property. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. court's recognition of will as valid proof of ownership. (Para 12 , 18 , 20) |
| 3. arguments regarding the legality of the trial court's judgment. (Para 13 , 14) |
| 4. court's analysis on joint versus self-acquired property. (Para 17 , 19) |
| 5. final dismissal of appeals against trial court judgment. (Para 22 , 23) |
judgment :
Narendra Kumar Vyas, J.
1. Heard on I.A. No. 03/2025, which is an application for deletion of the name of respondent No. 3 from the array of cause title. On due consideration the same is allowed and the name of the respondent No. 3 be deleted from the cause title.
2. This is plaintiff’s first appeal filed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 challenging the judgment and decree dated 10.03.2017 (Annexure A/1) passed by learned Additional District Judge, Bhatapara, District- Baloda Bazar Bhatapara (C.G.) in Civil Appeal No. H-03A/2010 (Ashwani Kumar Sahu Vs. Bholaram) whereby the suit filed by the plaintiff for declaration of title and permanent injunction, has been rejected.
3. For the sake of convenience, the parties would be referred to hereinafter as per t
The determination of property ownership validity relies on substantial proof of wills and the classification of property as joint or self-acquired.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the validity of a Will must be proved in accordance with the law, and in its absence, the rights of the parties are governed by the applicable....
The father of the coparceners had no right to bequeath ancestral property via Will. Wills are invalid unless proven in accordance with statutory requirements.
The propounder of a Will must prove its execution and attestation in accordance with law, and any suspicious circumstances surrounding the Will must be dispelled for it to be considered valid.
The burden lies on the propounder of a Will to prove its validity under Sections 68 and 69 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872; registration alone does not establish authenticity.
The court established that the validity of a Will must be proven through credible witness testimony, and the burden of proof lies with the propounder to dispel any suspicions regarding its authentici....
Suit for partition - Partial partition not permissible - Admission of parties - Will duly established and cannot be held to be forge or fabricated one.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
