SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Del) 284

SWATANTER KUMAR, MADAN B.LOKUR
REMFRY AND SONS – Appellant
Versus
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX VIII, NEW DELHI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
AJAY JHA, ANUP SHARMA, PREM LATA BANSAL, R.D.Jolly

SWATANTER KUMAR, J.

( 1 ) THIS Income Tax reference was returned unanswered vide order of the court dated 5th August, 2004 because nobody was present on behalf of the appellant on that date. The assessee filed an application being CM No. 2034/2005, for recalling of the order dated 5th August, 2004, for restoration of the reference to the file and for hearing of the matter on merits in accordance with law. This application was allowed by the Court vide a detailed order dated 14th February, 2005 vide which order dated 5th August, 2004 was recalled and we directed the matter to be heard on merits.

( 2 ) ON that very day, the matter was heard on merits and reserved for orders.

( 3 ) THE controversy in the present reference revolves around a fine distinction between the expressions illegality , irregularity , procedural irregularity , and whether it is curable or should proved fatal to the case of the assessee?

( 4 ) BEFORE we proceed to determine the various legal facets of this aspect of law, it would be appropriate for us to refer to facts giving rise to the present reference.

( 5 ) THE assessee in the relevant assessment year 1978-79 was a partnership concern, and was assessed for























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top