SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Del) 470

O.P.DWIVEDI
ASHA ROHTAGI – Appellant
Versus
ERSTWHILE NEW BANK OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
DHRUV MEHTA, HRSHVARDHAN JHA, P.S.Bindra, SANDEEP SETHI, Y.P.Chandna

O. P. DWIVEDI J.

( 1 ) THIS petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is directed against order dated 15. 2. 2005 passed by Shri S. M. Chopra, Additional Rent Control tribunal whereby tenant s appeal was allowed and the eviction order under section 14 (1) (b) of Delhi Rent Control Act (for short the Act ) passed by learned ARC vide order dated 24. 11. 2004 in eviction petition No. E-288/2004 was set aside.

( 2 ) BRIEFLY narrated, facts leading to this petition are that on 3. 10. 96 the petitioner herein filed an eviction petition under section 14 (1) (a) (b) of the Act against New Bank of India through General Manager and Punjab National Bank seeking their eviction from premises K-16, Chaudhary Building, Connaught Circus, new Delhi on the ground of non-payment of rent and sub-letting contemplated under clause (a) and (b) of proviso to sub section (1) of section 14 of the Act. It was alleged in the eviction petition that the demised premises were let out to New Bank of India for commercial purposes and the respondent has failed to pay arrears of rent from october 1993 till date despite service of demand notice dated 10. 10. 94. It was further stated that respondent N

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top