O.P.DWIVEDI
ASHA ROHTAGI – Appellant
Versus
ERSTWHILE NEW BANK OF INDIA – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is directed against order dated 15. 2. 2005 passed by Shri S. M. Chopra, Additional Rent Control tribunal whereby tenant s appeal was allowed and the eviction order under section 14 (1) (b) of Delhi Rent Control Act (for short the Act ) passed by learned ARC vide order dated 24. 11. 2004 in eviction petition No. E-288/2004 was set aside.
( 2 ) BRIEFLY narrated, facts leading to this petition are that on 3. 10. 96 the petitioner herein filed an eviction petition under section 14 (1) (a) (b) of the Act against New Bank of India through General Manager and Punjab National Bank seeking their eviction from premises K-16, Chaudhary Building, Connaught Circus, new Delhi on the ground of non-payment of rent and sub-letting contemplated under clause (a) and (b) of proviso to sub section (1) of section 14 of the Act. It was alleged in the eviction petition that the demised premises were let out to New Bank of India for commercial purposes and the respondent has failed to pay arrears of rent from october 1993 till date despite service of demand notice dated 10. 10. 94. It was further stated that respondent N
REFERRED TO : Singer India Ltd. Vs. Chander Mohan Chadha and others and another
General Radio and Appliances Co. Ltd and Others Vs. M.A. Khader (Dead) By LRs
Cox and Kings Ltd., and another Vs. Chander Malhotra (Smt.)
Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd., and Another Vs. Shyam Co operative Housing Society and Others
Singer India Ltd. Vs. Chander Mohan Chadha and Others
G.Sridharamurti Vs. Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. And another
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.