SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Del) 799

VIKRAMAJIT SEN
LODHI HOTEL EMPLOYEES WELFARE ASSOCIATION – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
J.P.Sengh, M.K.JHA, S.D.Sinha, TANUJ KHURANA, VIJAY SONDHI

VIKRAMAJIT SEN, J.

( 1 ) ALLOWED, subject to all just exceptions. RP 191/2005 in W. P. (C) No. 1561-64 of 2005.

( 2 ) BY means of this application filed under order XLVII Rule 1 of the CPC a Review of the Order dated 31. 1. 2005 has been prayed for. An Appeal was filed assailing this Order which was disposed of by the division Bench in the following terms: Learned counsel for the appellants seeks permission to withdraw these appeal and the application for condonation of delay with a view to pursue appropriate remedy. Permission granted. Dismissed as withdrawn.

( 3 ) THE question of maintainability of an application for Review filed in a situation where an appeal had also been preferred came up for consideration in Ashok Kumar Monga Vs UCO Bank reported as 2003 VIII ad (DELHI) 493. In that case it was held as under:

3. THE observations in (Raja) Indrajit Pratap Bahadur sahi vs. Amar Singh and others, AIR 1923 PC 128, which have stood the test of eighty long years, apply in full force. It was observed that where an appeal has been preferred a review is out of question. In Dev Krishna and another v. Dhani Ram Saligram, AIR 1959 MP 217, a division Bench of that Court had observed that a







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top