SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Del) 302

PRADEEP NANDRAJOG
SATISH SAINI – Appellant
Versus
MCD – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Abha Malhotra, ANUJ NARAIN, Ashok Bhasin, CHETAN DUTT

PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.

( 1 ) WRIT petitions in the 6 captioned petitions epitome a similar story and therefore must have a common epitaph. All writ petitioners hold Class IV posts under the Municipal Corporation of Delhi. In February 1999, the Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) proposed to levy Toll Tax on all commercial vehicles entering the Municipal Limits of M. C. D. The proposal was implemented.

( 2 ) PERSONS were needed to collect the Toll Tax. Pending creation of permanent posts and thereafter filling the same on permanent basis, MCD resolved to divert some of its existing employees to carry out and perform various duties connected with levy and recovery of Toll Tax. From different departments of MCD persons were posted in the Toll Tax Department in diverted capacity .

( 3 ) PETITIONERS who were working as Class IV employees in different departments of MCD were transferred and posted in the Toll Tax Department in diverted capacity and were designated as Toll Tax Collectors. In the orders, posting the petitioners in diverted capacity as Toll Tax Collectors, following was stipulated:-

"further these officials are hereby designated as Toll Tax Collector (TTC s) and will work o



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top