SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Del) 35

VIKRAMAJIT SEN
KAVI STALIN – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
M.A.CHINNASWAMY, RICHA KAPOOR,

VIKRAMAJIT SEN, J.

( 1 ) BY this common Order I shall dispose of both the Criminal Appeals together.

( 2 ) IN Criminal Appeal No. 511/99 the Appellant was charged under Section 307/34 IPC and FIR No. 114/1998 was registered. He was convicted by the Sessions Judge and sentenced to imprisonment of five years with a fine of Rs. 2,000/-, in default a further period of three months rigorous imprisonment. In Criminal Appeal No. 514/1999 the Appellant was charged under Section 394/34, 307/34, 397 IPC and Section 25 of the Arms Act and FIR No. 169/1998 was registered. He was convicted by the Sessions Judge and sentenced to imprisonment for five years with a fine of Rs. 2000/-, in default a further period of three months rigorous imprisonment.

( 3 ) ON appeal before this Court, the matter was remanded to the Sessions Judge to determine the age of the Appellant. The Sessions Judge in his report dated 24. 1. 2000 has recorded the following conclusions and findings:-

"in view of the evidence discussed above, the finding is given that at the time of commission of offence on dated 7. 3. 1998 in case FIR No. 114/1998 and the date of the commission of the offence on dated 10. 4. 1998 in case FIR No




Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top