SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Del) 503

MUKUL MUDGAL
TULIP I. T. SERVICES LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
G.L.RAVAL, JAGDIP KISHORE, KULJIT RAVAL

MUKUL MUDGAL J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner company which provides information technology service was an unsuccessful tenderer for computer networking connectivity in respect of a tender floated by the respondent Punjab National Bank on 4th June, 2004 and consequently its technical bid was rejected. This led to the filing of the present application under Section 9 of the Arbitration Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) by which interim orders under Section 9 of the Act are sought on the basis of the applicability of the Arbitration clause contained in clause 24 of the terms of tender.

( 2 ) THE issue involved in the present case is whether before the signing of agreement an arbitration clause contained in the tender documents can be availed of by a unsuccessful tenderer. The learned counsel for the parties have relied upon clauses 22 and 24 of the tender terms which read as follows :

"22. SIGNING OF CONTRACT the successful bidder (s) shall be required to enter into a rate contract with PNB, within 7 days of the award of the tender or within such extended period as may be specified by Bank on the basis of the Tender Document, the Tender of the successful bidder, the letter of acce















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top