SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Del) 1059

R.C.CHOPRA
MAHINDRA KUMAR NARENDRA – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Akshay Bipin, MOHIT MATHUR, RAHUL GUPTA, Rakesh Mukhija, S.TABREZ

R. C. CHOPRA, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioners feeling aggrieved by the registration of the FIR No. 375/2003 at PS Shahdara, Delhi under Section 498-A/406/506/323/34 IPC have filed this Writ petition under Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure with the prayer to quash the aforesaid FIR and restrain the respondents from taking any action in pursuance thereof.

( 2 ) THE facts relevant for the disposal of this petition, briefly stated, are that the petitioners are residents of raj Nagar, Ghaziabad, U. P. Petitioner No. 3, who is the son of petitioners No. 1 and 2, was married to Ms. Sarabpreet kaur, respondent No. 3, a resident of Delhi. On account of some matrimonial disputes between petitioner No. 3 and respondent No. 3, FIR No. 474/2003 dated 9. 7. 2003 was registered at PS Kavi Nagar, Ghaziabad, U. P. on the basis of a complaint filed by respondent No. 3. The said FIR was transferred to Delhi and thereafter, registered as fir No. 375 of 2003 at PS Shahdara, Delhi. The petitioners allege that the transfer of the FIR and the registration thereof at Delhi was an abuse of the process of law and as such, was liable to be quashe







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top