SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Del) 1030

B.C.PATEL, BADAR DURREZ AHMED
SHANTI FRAGRANCES – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
C.HARI SHANKAR, H.C.Bhatia, RAJEEV MEHRA, S.SUNIL NARAYANAN

B. C. Patel, C. J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner, by filing this petition, has challenged the insertion of Entry No. 46 "pan Masala and Gutka" by notification dated 31. 3. 2000 in the First Schedule of the Delhi Sales Tax Act, 1975 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act" ).

( 2 ) THE incidence and levy of sales tax is provided in Chapter II of the Act. The rate of tax is provided in Section 4 of the Act and in view of Section 4 (1 ) (a) of the Act, the tax can be levied in respect of the goods specified in the First Schedule, at the rate of twelve paise in a rupee. Tax free goods are specified in section. 7 of the Act. Sub-section (1) of Section 7 of the Act reads as under:

" (1) No tax shall be payable under this Act on the sale of goods specified in the Third Schedule subject to the conditions and exceptions, if any, set out therein. "sub-section (2) of Section 7 of the Act reads as under:

" (2) The Lieutenant Governor may, by notification in the Official Gazette, add to, or omit from, or otherwise amend, the Third Schedule either retrospectively or prospectively and thereupon the Third Schedule shall be deemed to be amended accordingly: provided that no such amendment shall be made retrospec

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top