BADAR DURREZ AHMED, B.C.PATEL
RAHUL MEHRA – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS writ petition has been filed in public interest claiming various reliefs against, inter alia, the Board Of Control For Cricket In India (Respondent no. 2) (hereinafter referred to as "bcci") and the Delhi and district Cricket Association (Respondent no. 3) (hereinafter referred to as "ddca") which is a member association of the BCCI. As claimed in the first paragraph of the petition, it has been filed to ensure that organizations such as BCCI and DDCA which have been created for the purpose of promotion of cricket in the country and which have acquired a monopoly status by virtue of alleged Government recognition and patronage, perform their duties and obligations which is to promote and develop cricket in the country and that they do not function as private empires of some businessmen and traders who have allegedly come to control it and abuse it for their own interests and profits. The petitioners contend that BCCI and DCCA function as Government recognised monopolies and, as such, perform State functions of promoting cricket in the country. They further contend that BCCI and DDCA cannot be permitted to function as purely private organisations wi
REFERRED TO : Shri Ajay Jadeja v. Union of India and Ors
Andi Mukta Sadguru Shree Muktajee Vandas Swami Suvarna Jayanti Mahotsav Smarak Trust v. V.R. Rudani
Vst Industries Ltd. v. Vst Industries Workers Union
G.Bassi Reddy v. International Crops Research Institute
Referred to : Federal Bank Ltd. v. Sagar Thomas
REFERRED TO : Swami Suvarna Jayanti Mahotsav Smarak Trust v.V.R. Rudani
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.