SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Del) 359

A.K.SIKRI
PAWAN KUMAR,GANGA BISHAN GUPTA – Appellant
Versus
FINANCIAL COMMISSIONER, DELHI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Ajay Laroia, O.N.Vohra, Shruti Shashi, Sujata Kashyap, V.K.Tandon

A. K. SIKRI, J.

( 1 ) THESE writ petitions arise in identical circumstance and same question of law is involved. Therefore they are disposed of by this common judgment

( 2 ) FOR the sake of convenience, facts from cwp No. 1548/2000 are noted.

( 3 ) THE predecessor in interest of the petitioners, namely, Sh. Mamam Singh, smt. Hoshiari Devi, Tara Chand, Ram Narain and Smt. Sarjo residents of village Bamnoli, delhi were allotted certain lands in that village i. e. Khasra Nos. 198 (2-12), 204/2 (5-3), khasra number 221/2 (3-13), 217 (5-11) and 200 (4-17) respectively. Since there is a dispute about the nature of these allotments, this aspect shall be adverted to at the appropriate stage. What is admitted position is that these persons moved applications under Section 74 (4) of the Delhi Land Reforms act (for short the Act ) in the court of SDM/ ra praying that the Gaon Sabha be directed to admit them as bhumidars of the aforesaid land. These applications were decided in then- favour holding that they had amply proved they satisfactorily reclaimed the land and made it fit for cultivation and as such they were to be admitted as bhumidars under Section 74 as in terms of Section 75, the Ga



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top