SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Del) 1209

MUKUL MUDGAL
BIRDHI CHAND NAUNAG RAM JAIN – Appellant
Versus
P. O. ,LABOUR COURT NO. IV – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
H.K.SRIVASTAVA, VINAY SABHARWAL

MUKUL MUDGAL J.

( 1 ) THIS is an application under Section 17-B of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (in short the `id Act ) seeking payment of wages not less than the minimum wages from the date of the award, i. e. , dated 6th May, 1999, passed in ID. No. 465/79.

( 2 ) IN para 2 of the application it has been averred that the applicant/workman is unemployed since the date of the termination of his services upto date. In reply, the petitioner has sought to contend that the respondent No. 3/applicant by selling of miscellaneous items in front of Birla Mandir, Mandir Marg, New Delhi is making a monthly income of Rs. 5,000/ -. In the rejoinder, the respondent No. 3/applicant has contended that he was carry on this street activity only for one month and in any case that amount generated by this activity was not sufficient for him to sustain his family. He has relied upon the judgment of the Hon ble Supreme Court in Rajinder Kumar Vs Delhi Administration reported as AIR 1984 SC 1805to the following effect:-

"in support of this submission Mr. Jain pointed out that the appellant in his cross-examination has admitted that during his forced absence from employment since the date of terminati



Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top