SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Del) 194

MANMOHAN SARIN
COURT IN ITS OWN MOTION – Appellant
Versus
J. R. GANGWANI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.K.SINGH, ASHOK KASHYAP, ATUL BATRA, J.R.GANGVANI

MANMOHAN SARIN

( 1 ) THE facts giving rise to the present proceedings for contempt may be briefly noted. One Durga Devi had filed a petition impleading Anupam Gardens Friends Association as respondent No. 1 Chairman of Delhi Pollution Control Board later on substituted by Delhi Pollution Control Committee and the DVB as respondent No. 2 and 3. Smt Durga Devi claimed that she was legal heir of the Bhumidar who owned a plot of land of 176 sq yards in khasra No. 119 in Saidulajaib. The said plot had been handed over to respondent No. 1 Anupam Gardens Friends Association under an agreement to sell, power of attorney and receipt of possession etc. Grievance of the petitioner was that in stead of using the said plot of land for horticulture purpose, it was being misused for non-agriculture purpose in contravention of Delhi Land Reforms Act. Diesel generators were being run which were causing pollution.

( 2 ) SHOW cause notice had been issued to the respondent. DPCC after an inspection filed an affidavit that three generators were being run in contravention of Section 45 of Electricity Supply Act and there were sufficient deficiencies resulting in polluting activity. DPCC claim that it had
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top