SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Del) 499

S.N.KAPUR
GOYAL GRAMODYOG SANSTHAN – Appellant
Versus
SETH BROTHERS – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
AJAY SAHNI, MANINDER SINGH, PRATIBHA M.SINGH, RAJIV NAYAR

S. N. Kapoor, J.

( 1 ). This order shall dispose of above named FAO 331 of 2002 filed against granting injunction as well as a Civil Revision Petition No. 5420/2002 against rejection of an application under Order 7 Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure (for short the cpc ) moved by defendants No. 1 to 3 petitioners, namely, goyal Gramudyog Sansthan, Goyal Brothers and Goyal Herbals (P) Ltd. Both the matters are being taken together for they involve some common question of law and facts.

( 2 ). Brief facts giving an occasion to this appeal and Civil Revision are as follows : Plaintiff/respondent No. 1, M/s. Seth Brothers, filed a suit for permanent injunction for restraining infringement of the trade mark, copyright, passing off and rendition of accounts in respect of one of its ayurvedic medicine/churan "kayam CHURAN" used for curing chronic constipation, headache and hyper acidity. The plaintiff/respondent claimed that they adopted and put to use trademark "kayam" in the year 1977 and they are the registered proprietor of the trade mark "kayam" registered under No. 348061-B dated 1st April, 1979. The plaintiff/respondent filed the suit when they came across the products of defen


























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top