SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Del) 432

H.R.MALHOTRA, A.K.SIKRI
KRISHAK BHARATI CO OPERATIVE LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
ALUTEC INC – Respondent


S. B. SINHA

( 1 ) A judgment and order dated 14. 09. 2001, passed in an application filed by the respondent herein purported to be under section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 ( hereinafter referred to as the Act ) being A. A. No. 236 of 1998 by a learned single Judge of this Court, is the subject matter of this writ petition.

( 2 ) HAVING regard to the question involved in this writ petition, it is not necessary to state the facts of the matter in great details.

( 3 ) 25. 11. 1994 in terms whereof the respondent was required to provide consultancy services for the "due Diligence Process" and project implementation activities for engineering, technological, environmental, economic, financial and legal analysis of the three targeted companies identified through-the "search and Screen Process".

( 4 ) PURSUANT to and in furtherance of the said agreement, services of sub-consultants were taken to prepare "due Diligence report" wherefor a service agreement was executed between the parties on 31. 03. 1995.

( 5 ) THE said report was delivered to the petitioner and the final version of the plant acquisition project was submitted on 13. 09. 1995, recommending acquisition








































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top