( 1 ) THIS petition under Section 25-B (8) or Delhi rent control act 1958 ( hereinafter REFERRED TO to an the Act" only) assails an order dated 11. 9. 2001, passed by learned additional rent controller, Delhi, in eviction petition No. 108/95, passing eviction orders under section 14 (1) (e) read with section 25b of the Act in Favour of the respondent and against the petitioner/tenant.

( 2 ) I have heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondent. I have gone through the records.

( 3 ) THE petitioner-tenant assails the impugned eviction order on two grounds firstly That The petition was bad For non-jointer of necessary parties as ail The LRs of the deceased-tenant Pares Ram had not been imploded and secondly That The respondent-landlady had no bonafide need in respect of The premises in question.

( 4 ) LEARNED counsel for The petitioner argues That The premises in question were let out to deceased Paras Ram and after his death the tenancy had devolved upon his widow, sons and daughters but The eviction petition was Filed against The petitioner widow only without impleading The other LRs. He relies upon a Judgement in Mohd. Idress and anothe