SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Del) 1073

R.C.CHOPRA
SASKEN COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
PRIME TELESYSTEMS LIMITED – Respondent


R. C. CHOPRA

( 1 ) THIS petition under Section 11 (4) of the arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred, to as "the Act" only) has been filed with a prayer to appoint an Arbitrator on behalf of respondent no. 1 to enter reference and adjudicate upon the matter. No dispute is stated to be existing with respondents no. 3 and 4 and as such no relief is claimed against them but a right is reserved to institute arbitration proceedings against them also upon their failure to honour their obligations under the Subscription cum share holders Agreement dated 28. 2. 2001.

( 2 ) ACCORDING to the petitioner the applicant Company alongwith M/s Citicorp Finance (India) and Intel Capital corporation (hereinafter referred to as Investors No. 1 and 2 respectively) had entered into a subscription cum-Shareholders Agreement dated 28. 2. 2001 with respondent No. 1 and its promoters respondents 2,3 and 4. In terms of this agreement the applicant and investors consented to invest in the equity share capital of respondent No. 1 by subscribing to preferential issue on the basis of certain representations, warranties, undertakings, statements and covenants made by respondent No. 2,3 and 4












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top