SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Del) 134

B.K.RAMAMOORTHY
VINOD KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Harjinder Singh, MUKTA GUPTA, Priya Saxena, YOGESH SAXENA

K. RAMAMOORTHY

( 1 ) THE petitioner has challenged the detention order passed by the Government of n. C. T. under the National Security Act, 1980. Before introducing the grounds of challenge in the writ petition it would be convenient for the appreciation of the case to notice a few facts. The petitioner has been indulging himself in activities which are criminal in nature and has been terrorising people with reference to the submission of tenders to the different authorities including M. C. D. Taking into account the activities of the petitioner, on 1/6/1998 an order u/s 47 of the D. P. Act, 1978 was passed. Inspite of the surveillance by the police the petitioner continued with his activities and, therefore, the Government had to resort to the provisions of the National Security Act, 1980. An order of detention was passed on 8/6/1999 by the Commissioner of Police. On 11/6/1999 the petitioner made a representation to this Court. On 15/6/1999 the government of N. C. T. approved the order of Commissioner dated 8/6/1999 U/s 3 (5) national Security Act, 1980. On 16/6/1999 a report was submitted by Govt. of N. C. T. to the Central Government. That was received by the Central Government











































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top