SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Del) 456

A.K.SIKRI
REVION INC. – Appellant
Versus
HOSIDEN LABORATORIES (INDIA) – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
SADHNA SHARMA

A. K. SIKRI

( 1 ) THE plaintiffs have filed the suit for permanent injunction, passing of, infringement of trade mark and rendition of accounts etc.

( 2 ) IT is stated in the plaint that the plaintiff no 1 is a company incorporated under the laws of the state of Delaware. United States of America and is carrying on its business at the address given in the plaint- Plaintiff No. 2 is a company incorporated under the laws of Switzer land and it is carrying on business at the address given in the plaint. It is a wholly owned company of the plaintiff No. 1

( 3 ) THE basic averments on the basis of which present suit is filed are that the plaintiffs are the registered proprietor of the trade mark jontue in respect of cosmetics, perfumes etc. having registered the same in various countries of the world. The word jontue is an invented word coined by the plaintiff and is not a dictionary word or a word that is used in common parlance. The said trade mark has also been duly registered in India by the plaintiffs predecessor under the provisions of the Trade and Merchandise Marks act, 1958. The particulars of such registrations are given below:- trade Mark class goods no. Date of Regn. Date











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top