MUKUNDAKAM SHARMA
SATPAL – Appellant
Versus
CHIEF OF ARMY STAFF – Respondent
( 1 ) IN this petition the petitioner has prayed for issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the respondent to reinstate the petitioner in service with a further relief that the petitioner should be paid all arrears of pay, benefits and other consequential reliefs arising out of his reinstatement.
( 2 ) WHILE the petitioner was working in the indian Army a criminal case was registered against him on the allegation that on or about 2nd and 3/01/1986 the petitioner committed murder of his sister-in-law. The designated court, Rohtak, haryana conducted the trial in the aforesaid criminal case registered under section 302indian Penal Code and numbered as Sessions Case No. 109/1986. By a judgment/order"dated 25. 9. 1987 the designated court convicted the petitioner under section 302 of the indian Penal Code read with section 25 of the Arms act and section 6 of the Terrorist and Disruptive activities (Prevention) Act, 1985. The petitioner filed, a criminal Appeal No. 420/1988 in the Supreme court of India -as/against the aforesaid Judgment and order. In the said appeal the petitioner was released on bail. On being so released on bail when the petitioner went to report fo
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.