SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Del) 494

MUKUNDAKAM SHARMA
SATPAL – Appellant
Versus
CHIEF OF ARMY STAFF – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
AMITA GUPTA, Jayant Bhushan

MUKUNDAKAM SHARMA

( 1 ) IN this petition the petitioner has prayed for issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the respondent to reinstate the petitioner in service with a further relief that the petitioner should be paid all arrears of pay, benefits and other consequential reliefs arising out of his reinstatement.

( 2 ) WHILE the petitioner was working in the indian Army a criminal case was registered against him on the allegation that on or about 2nd and 3/01/1986 the petitioner committed murder of his sister-in-law. The designated court, Rohtak, haryana conducted the trial in the aforesaid criminal case registered under section 302indian Penal Code and numbered as Sessions Case No. 109/1986. By a judgment/order"dated 25. 9. 1987 the designated court convicted the petitioner under section 302 of the indian Penal Code read with section 25 of the Arms act and section 6 of the Terrorist and Disruptive activities (Prevention) Act, 1985. The petitioner filed, a criminal Appeal No. 420/1988 in the Supreme court of India -as/against the aforesaid Judgment and order. In the said appeal the petitioner was released on bail. On being so released on bail when the petitioner went to report fo













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top