R.S.SODHI
NARESH KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF DELHI – Respondent
( 1 ) NOTICE. Learned Counsel for the State accepts notice. Admit. Criminal Appeal No. 335/2001 is directed against the judgment and order of the learned Additional Sessions Judge in SC No. 124/98 whereby the learned Additional. Sessions Judge held the appellant guilty under Section 7 of the Essential Commodities act by judgement dated 27. 4. 2001 and by a separate order of the same date was pleased to impose a sentence of three months with fine of Rs. 1,000. 00 and in default of payment of fine to undergo further simple imprisonment, for 15 days.
( 2 ) LEARNED Counsel for the appellant does not challenge the order of conviction on merits. He, however, submits that in the facts of the present case, the appellant ought to have been given the benefit of probation under Section 360, Criminal Procedure Code. and/or the Probation of Offenders Act. He submits that the offence was committed on 3/10/1996 for violating notification, which prohibited storing of edible oil beyond a particular measure. However, this notification was withdrawn on 10/11/1997. He submits that the offence, it at all, now if of technical nature and does not warrant imprisonment.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.