SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Del) 649

D.K.JAIN, ARIJIT PASAYAT
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX – Appellant
Versus
BRIG. KAPIL MOHAN NEW DELHI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
AJAY JHA, ANUP SHARMA, M.HUSAIN, P.L.BANSAL, R.D.Jolly, R.K.RAGHVAN

ARIJIT PASAYAT

( 1 ) PURSUANT to directions given by this Court in ITC No. 44/92 under Section 256 (2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (in short the act ), following question has been referred for opinion of this Court by the income-tax Appellate Tribunal. Delhi Bench c (in short the Tribunal):

"whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal was Justified in holding that the Trust settled for the benefit of the sole beneficiary first son of Shri Rakesh mohan who was unborn at the time of creation of the Trust, is a valid trust?"

( 2 ) FACTUAL background in nutshell is as follows: assessee settled 60,000 equity shares of Mohan Meakin Breweries Ltd. of the face value of Rs. 5. 00 each for the benefit of first son of Shri Rakesh Mohan, son of late Col. V. R. Mohan. For this purpose a trust was created on 2. 5. 1974. Income-tax Officer (in short the ito ) was of the view that the trust was not valid and effective as there was no existence of any beneficiary. Income arising out of the aforesaid shares was included in the income of the assessee. Matter was carried in appeal before the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) (in short the cit (A)







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top