SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Del) 697

DEVENDER GUPTA, SANJAY KISHAN KAUL
AKESH KUMAR JAIN – Appellant
Versus
HARMEET SINGH BAKSHI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
KAMAL MEHTA, Niraj Malhotra, VIPIN SANGHI

Sanjay Kishan Kaul

( 1 ) THE application has been filed by the appellants under Order 41 Rule 27 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 for filing an additional document on record for purposes of hearing the present appeal. The document in question is the Will dated 6. 4. 93 alleged to have been executed by late Shri Bakshi Shamsher Singh in favour of Mr; S. S. Sahni in respect of the first floor of property bearing No. D-1059, New Friends Colony, New Delhi. It has been stated in the application that since the appellants were not parties to the present document, they could not obtain copy of the same on an earlier date. It has been further averred that the document in question is of an unimpeachable nature and the same may be considered for purposes of hearing the present appeal.

( 2 ) IN view of the averments made in the application, we are of the view that no harm or prejudice is likely to be caused to the other party in case the application filed by the appellants is allowed. The- document is taken on record and will be considered in the appeal.

( 3 ) THIS application has been filed by the appellants under Section 151 of the code of Civil Procedure, 1908 seeki




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top