SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Del) 1483

A.K.SIKRI
SAKALAIN MEGHJI – Appellant
Versus
BM HOUSE (INDIA) LIMITED – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
PRAVIN ANAND, S.K.MITTAL, SHANTHA DEVI RAMAN

A. K. SIKRI

( 1 ) BY this order I propose to dispose of both the applications i. e. IA. 6940/2001 and IA. 7311/ 2001. IA. 6940/2001 is filed by the plaintiff for ad-interim injunction whereas IA. 7311/2001 is filed by the defendant seeking vacation of injunction order dated 6/8/2001. Both the applications were therefore heard together.

( 2 ) THE suit filed by the plaintiff is for permanent injunction in respect of passing off, infringement of trademark and copyright and for damages and delivery up. Subject matter of the suit are two magazines, one published by the plaintiff and other published by the defendant- both titled "wedding Affair". The case of the plaintiff is that his magazine is published from London and circulated in most parts of the world including India and that the defendant has started its publication with the same name infringing his trade mark and copyright.

( 3 ) WHEN the matter came up for preliminary hearing on 3/8/2001, notice in the application was issued for 6/8/2001. Notice was duly served on the defendant. However, the defendant did not appear on 6/8/2001. Having regard to the averments made in the plaint as well as in IA. 6940/2001 and in the absence of a


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top