SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(Del) 1026

M.K.SHARMA
SMITHKLINE BICHAM – Appellant
Versus
HINDUSTAN LEVER LIMITED – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.H.Desai, ARUN JAITLEY, HEMANT SINGH, Michael Fysh, Navin Chawla, P.N.SEVAK, PARVIN ANAND, V.P.Singh

Dr. M. K. Sharma, J

( 1 ) THE plaintiffs instituted a suit in this court praying for a decree of declaration that the plaintiffs are exclusive owners and proprietors of the tooth brush designs `acqua FLEX and `acquafresh FLEX N DIRECT having foreign registrations. In the suit a decree for permanent injunction was also sought for preventing infringement of the tooth brush design registration of the plaintiffs by restraining defendants, their partners, servants and agents from manufacturing, selling or offering for sale tooth brushes bearing same designs which are identical with or deceptively similar to the tooth brush of the plaintiffs and also from restraining the defendants 1 and 2 jointly and severally from passing off their business and goods as those of the plaintiffs and also for payment of damages for a sum of Rs. 5,05,000. 00. Alongwith the aforesaid suit an application for temporary injunction was also filed seeking for an injunction restraining the defendants from making infringement to the said tooth brush design and from manufacturing, selling or offering for sale tooth brushes having designs which are identical with or deceptively similar to that of the plaintiffs.

(

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top