SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Del) 1455

SHARDA AGGARWAL
INDIAN HERBS RESEARCH AND SUPPLY COMPANY LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
LALJI MAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ASHOK GUPTA, R.K.AGARWAL, S.K.BANSAL

SHARDA AGGARWAL

( 1 ) THE application under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 Civil Procedure Code for temporary injunction has been moved by the plaintiff in the suit for perpetual injunction to restrain the defendants from infringing their registered trade mark "himalayan -BATISA" and, from using the artistic work/ label registered under,the Copy Right Act,1957 in respect of "ayurvedic veterinary medical preparations" and from passing off their goods under the of fe. ndi. ng trade mark "himalaya BATISA" or under any other trade mark/label which may be identical with and/or deceptively similar to the plaintiffs registered trade mark.

( 2 ) PLAINTIFFS have been carrying on their business of manufacturing and marketing of "ayurvedic veterinary medical preparations" since 1956 under the trade mark/label himalayan BATISA" which is duly registered in the name of the plaintiffs under the Trade and Merchandise marks Act,1958 (in short the Act. ). The plaintiff No. 1 is also the owner of copyright of the artistic work of the label consisting of "himalayan BATISA" which is duly registered under the Copy Right Act, 1957. The allegations are that the products of the plaintiffs marketed under the trade























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top