V.S.AGGARWAL
SARAVJIT SINGH – Appellant
Versus
SARASWATI BUILDERS – Respondent
( 1 ) BY this common judgment, the following three suits can conveniently be dispoed of together. 1. Suit No. 2210/97 mrs. Sarawjeet Singh. . . Plaintiff. vs. M/s. Saraswati Builders and Ors. . . . Defendants 2. Suit No. 2211/97 mr. M. Jha. . . Plaintiff. vs. M/s. Saraswati Builders and Ors. . . . Defendants. 3. Suit No. 2212/97 mrs. Sushila Devi Jha. . . Plaintiff. vs. M/s. Saraswati Builders and Ors. . . . Defendants. All the three suits had been consolidated by this Court vide order passed on 18. 9. 1998. Since the question involved are identical, for sake of convenience the same are being mentioned from Suit no. 2211/97.
( 2 ) THE plaintiff N. Jha had filed the suit seeking a declaration, declaring the agreement to sell dated 13. 1. 1997, to be null and void and for recovery of rs. 15,61,570/- besides pendente lite interest at the rate of 24% p. a. Rs. 5,50,000. 00 are claimed as damages suffered by the plaintiff by keeping blocked the amount of the plaintiff of Rs. 27. 00 lakhs to honour its obligation under the agreement to sell dated 13. 1. 1997.
( 3 ) THE facts alleged in the plaint are that defendant (M/s. Saraswati Builders) is a partnership firm and Mrs. Ne
REFERRED TO : Harbans Singh v. Shanti Devi
Kuldip Singh Suri v. Surinder Singh Kalra and Anr.
Badat and Co. v. East India Trading Co.
M/s Thompson Press (India) Ltd. v. M/s Megh and Co. and Ors.
Shree Hanuman Cotton Mills and Anr. v. Tata Air Craft Ltd.
Delhi Development Authority v. Grihsthapana Cooperative Group Housing Society
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.