SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Del) 235

M.S.A.SIDDIQUI
MOHAMMAD RAFFIQUE – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF DELHI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
KAMLESH DUTT, M.S.BUTALIA

M. S. A. SIDDIQUI, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal is directed against the judgment and the order dated 20. 4. 99 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Delhi in Sessions Case No. 118/95 convicting the appellant under Section 21 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act (for short the act ) and sentencing him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 10 years and to pay fine of Rs. 1 lakhs or in default to suffer further rigorous imprisonment for one year.

( 2 ) BRIEFLY stated, the prosecution case is that on 1st April, 1995 at 9. 45 A. M. a police party led by Sub Inspector Satpal (P. W. 6), upon information received, apprehended the appellant in the Gali Masjid Wali, Mohalla Shahganj Delhi. The appellant was given the option (Ex. Public Witness. 3/8) of being searched before a Gazetted Officer or a Magistrate. He declined the offer. Thereupon SHO P. L. Puri (P. W. 2), directed the Constable Jamil Ahmad (P. W. 4) to search the appellant. Pursuant to the said direction, Constable Jamil Ahmad (P. W. 4) searched the appellant and recovered one packet containing 5 gms. of heroin from right side pocket of his Kurta. The contraband was seized vide recovery memo (Ex. Public Witness. 2/a )















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top