SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Del) 126

M.K.SHARMA
SUNDARI BALA – Appellant
Versus
LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR DELHI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
K.L.Gupta, Rakesh Kumar, SANJAY PODDAR

M. K. SHARMA

( 1 ) IN the present writ petition the petitioner has challenged the legality of the orderdated 15. 2. 1990 passed by the Special Secretary of Delhi Administration rejectingthe claim of the petitioner for allotment of alternative land. By this writ petition thepetitioner also seeks for adirection to the respondents for allotment of an alternativeplot in favour of the petitioner in terms of the scheme adopted by the respondents inthe year 1961.

( 2 ) LAND of the petitioner measuring 9 biswas comprised in Khasra No. "1189/317situated in Village Kilokari was acquired by the respondent. In respect of the aforesaidacquisition proceedings an award was passed on 16. 5. 1961. The petitioner receivedcompensation as admitted by her sometime in the month of April, 1969 and theconstruction standing on the said land was demolished by the respondent afteracquisition of the land sometime in the month of March, 1969. The petitioner reliesupon the scheme adopted by the respondents in the year 1961. She claims allotmentof an alternative plot of land in view of the aforesaid acquisition of her land inaccordance with the terms and conditions of the scheme adopted by the respondentin 1961.









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top