SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Del) 260

VIKRAMAJIT SEN
HIGH WAY FARMS – Appellant
Versus
CHINTA RAMANDORS – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ANIL KHER, RAHUL GUPTA

Vikramajit Sen, J.

( 1 ) THIS application for temporary injunction has been filed in a suit for the specific performance of land situated in Khasra Nos. 314 (4-16), 313 (4- 16), 315 (4-16) situated in Village Shahroorpur, District Mehrauli, New Delhi. This agreement based on a receipt dated 22. 9. 1991 has allegedly been signed by defendant Nos. 1,3,9,10 and II. In this very suit specific performance of another piece of land has also been claimed on the basis of another receipt dated 3. 10. 1991. The land mentioned in the second receipt is situated in Khasra No. 311 (4-16), 312 (1- 4) situated in the same village and allegedly executed by defendant Nos. 13,14 and 15. There is no document witnessing any agreement between plaintiff and defendant Nos. 2,4,5,6,7,8 and 12 but they have all been impleaded in the suit.

( 2 ) LEARNED Counsel for defendants had raised an objection to the maintainability of the suit on the ground of mis-joinder of parties as well as mis-joinder of causes of action. Primafacie both these objections are well founded but in the view which I have taken, I need not expand on these objections.

( 3 ) AS lias been stated above, the suit is predicated on two document







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top