SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Del) 431

J.B.GOEL
ANAND DIP SINGH – Appellant
Versus
RANJIT KAUR – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.SALVAN, H.L.TIKKU, I.S.Alagh, INDERBIR SINGH, L.R.GUPTA, S.K.Kaul

J. B. Goel, J.

( 1 ) TWO applications, I. A. 7928/95 and I. A. 180/98 by defendants No. 9 and 10 andthird application IA No. 5125/96 by defendant No. 8 have been filed under Order 23rule 3 Civil Procedure Code for setting aside the compromise-decree passed on 25. 8. 1993. Briefly the facts are that plaintiff Anand Deep Singh had Filed a suit for partitionof immovable and movable properties, declaration of fights in the property and forrendition of accounts thereof. The properties are alleged to be owned by late Sirdatar Singh. Sir Datar Singh died on 17. 5. 1973 leaving behind his widow, lady Satwantdatar Singh, two sons, Kanwar Mahinder Pal Singh and S. Maninder Singh and twodaughters, Smt. Arnleshwar Anand (defendant No. 8) and Smt. Kirpal Kaur (defendant No. 9 ). His widow died on 6. 6. 1979, Kanwar Mahinder Pal Singh, died on 4. 4. 198]defendants No. l to 5 are his widow and four daughters, S. Maninder Singh. also diedon 24. 9. 1987, leaving behind plaintiff, and defendant No. 7, two sons, defendant No. 6his widow and defendants No. 11and12 two daughters. Defendant No. 10 is the daughterof defendant No. 9. Plaintiff had claimed partition in respect of the following properties :

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top