SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Del) 723

ARIJIT PASAYAT, D.K.JAIN
JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME – Appellant
Versus
ANATRONICS GENRAL COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
R.D.Jolly, V.V.Eradi

ARIJIT PASAYAT, C. J.

( 1 ) IN this appeal under Section 260-A of the Income-tax Act 1961 (in short the Act) order of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal. New Delhi (in short Tribunal ) in ITA No. 6110/d/95 dated 16th December 1998 is under challenge, in respect of the question as regards the rate of depreciation on the bottles given on lease to another concern. The dispute relates to assessment year 1987-88.

( 2 ) FACTUAL position which is almost undisputed is as follows: Assessee company supplies bottles to other concerns on lease basis. For the relevant assessment year, depreciation was claimed on bottles valued of Rs. 14,99,508. 00/- @ 100%. However the assessing Officer allowed depreciation @ 15% under the first proviso to Section 32 (i) of the Act. For disallowing assessee s claim of depreciation @ 100%, it was observed that though bottles were plant, each bottle cannot constitute plant and only all the bottles which were acquired can be taken as plant. Reference was made to purchases on several dates to hold that the value of bottles, treated as "plant" purchased on the relevant dates exceeded Rs. 50003. 00. Ultimately he held that each bottle did not constitute a plant and al





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top