1998(3) Supreme 213
Supreme Court of India
(From Karnataka High Court)
Sujata V. Manohar & D.P. Wadhwa, JJ.
Commissioner of Income Tax, Karnataka, Bangalore -Appellant
versus
M/s. Shaan Finance (P) Ltd., Bangalore etc. -Respondents
Civil Appeal Nos. 7077-78 of 1993
With
C.A. No. 1646 of 1994
And
C.A. No. 1692-1693 of 1998
(Arising out of SLP (C) Nos. 3592-3593 of 1997)
Decided on 20-3-1998
Counsel for the Parties :
For the Appellant : T.L.V. Iyer, Sr. Advocate, (T.C. Sharma), Advocate for B.K. Prasad, Advocate.
For the Respondent C.A. Nos. 7077-78/93: Ms. Janaki Ramachandran, Advocate (Mukul Mudgal), Advocate (NP).
For the Respondent in C.A. No 1692-93/ 98 : Arvind P. Datar, (U.A. Rana, (S. Tripathi), Advocates for M/s. Gagrat & Co., Advocates.
Held : The High Courts of Karnataka and Madras have held that looking to the requirements specified in Section 32A the assessees, in the present case, fulfil all the requirements of that section, namely, (1) the machinery is owned by the assessee; (2) the machinery is used for the purpose of assessees’ business and; (3) the machinery is as specified in sub-section (2). (Para 9)
We are inclined to agree with this reasoning of the High Courts of Karnataka and Madras. (Para 10)
In the premises, the appeals are dismissed with costs. (Para 20)
Judgment
Mrs. Sujata V. Manohar, J.-Delay condoned.
2. Leave granted.
3. These appeals raise a common question relating to the assessee’s entitlement to investment allowance under Section 32A of Income-tax Act, 1961. The assessee companies, as their names suggest, are financial companies which purchase machinery and hire out the machinery to manufacturers under agreements of hire. The common question in these appeals relates to the entitlement of the assessees to investment allowance under Section 32A of the Income-tax Act, 1961. For the sake of convenience, we are setting out the question as framed in Civil Appeal Nos. 7077-78 of 1993. The question is as follows :
“Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in holding that in respect of the machineries owned by the assessee, but leased to third parties and used by them for the manufacture of article or thing, investment allowance was allowable under Section 32A?”
4. The assessees are not themselves manufacturers of any article or thing. The machineries, however, which are owned by them are hired to different persons for the purpose of their business of manufacturing. In respect of these machineries, assessees claimed investment allowance under Section 32A. In all these proceedings, the concerned High Courts, being the High Courts of Karnataka and Madras, have held the assessees as entitled to investment allowance under Section 32A. Hence these appeals have been preferred before us.
5. The relevant provisions of Section 32A are as follows:
“32. (1) In respect of a ship or an aircraft or machinery or plant specified in sub-section (2), which is owned by the assessee and is wholly used for the purposes of the business carried on by him, there shall, in accordance with and subject to the provisions of this section, be allowed a deduction, in respect of the previous year in which the ship or aircraft was acquired or the machinery or plant was installed or, if the ship, aircraft, machinery or plant is first put to use in the immediately succeeding previous year, then, in respect of that previous year, of a sum by way of investment allowance, equal to twenty-five per cent, of the actual cost of the ship, aircraft, machinery or plant to the assessee :
Provided that ........
(2) The ship or aircraft or machinery or plant referred to in sub-section (1) shall be the following, namely :-
(a) a new ship or new aircraft acquired after the 31st day of March, 1976, by an assessee engaged in the business of operation of ships or aircraft;
(b) any new machinery or plant installed after the 31st day of March, 1976-
(i) for the purposes of business of generation or distribution of electricity or any other form of power; or
(ii) in a small scale industrial undertaking for the purposes of business of manufacture or production of any article or thing; or
(iii) in any other industrial undertaking for the purposes of business of construction, manufacture or production of any article or thing not being an article or thing specified in the list in the Eleventh Schedule.”
(underlining ours)
6. Therefore, in respect, inter alia, of plant and machinery for which an investment allowance is claimed in any relevant previous year, an assessee must satisfy the following conditions:
(1) The machinery should be owned by the assessee.
(2) It should be wholly used for the purposes of the business carried on by the assessee, and
(3) The machinery must come under any of the categories specified in sub-section (2) of Section 32A.
7. Sub-section (2) describes such machinery, plant as also ship or aircraft. Under sub-section (2)(b)(iii) any new machinery or plant installed after 31st of March, 1976 in any industrial undertaking for the purpose of manufacture or production of any article or thing, not being an article or thing specif
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.