SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Del) 750

D.K.JAIN, ARIJIT PASAYAT
ANDREWS SCOTS EDUCATION SOCIETY – Appellant
Versus
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
NEMO K.PARASARAN, U.L.VATVANI

Arijit Pasayat

( 1 ) IN this appeal under Clause 10 of the Letters Patent, judgment of learned Single Judge dated 19. 4. 2000 in C. W. P. No. 2532/95 is under challenge.

( 2 ) FACTUAL position, which is almost undisputed is as follows: A demand was made by the Delhi Development Authority (in short the DDA) from the petitioner Society for an amount of Rs. 3,19,554. 35 as additional cost of the land allotted to it. The said demand was challenged and a prayer was made for a direction to the DDA to calculate the cost of land payable in the light of judgment in DDA v. Lala Amur Nath Educational and Human Society, 42 (1990) DLT 651. Petitioner pleaded in the writ petition that if is Society registered under the Societies Registration Act with the object of working for welfare, education and betterment of the children. With the aforesaid objective, it intended to start a middle school for providing education to the weaker sections of the society. It obtained an essentiality certificate from the Directorate of Education in 1989. Its name was sponsored for allotment of land by the Directorate of Education of Delhi. On the basis thereof, the DDA by letter dated 11. 2. 1991 allotted a land to









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top