SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(Del) 286

B.GOEL
NAFIS AHMAD SIDDIQUI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF DELHI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Aman Lekhi, M.D.TANEJA, P.N.LEKHI, Raman Sawhney

J. B. Goel, J.

( 1 ) BY this order two applications being Crl. M. (M) 4699/98 under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (for short the Code ) filed by Nafees Ahmad Siddiqui (for short nafees ) for bail and the other being Crl. M. (M) 654/99 under Section 482 of the Code filed by the complainant Shri P. D. Lakhani for setting aside the order dated 20/2/1999 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge admitting respondents No. 2 to 5, namely, Shadab Ahmed Siddiqui, Nadeem Ahmed Siddiqui, Shailendra Dixit and Waseem Faridi (for short Shabad, Nadeem, Dixit and Waseem) to anticipatory bail.

( 2 ) NAFEES alongwith Brij Mohan Sharma, Sanotsh Kumar Sharma, Ram Kishan Chauhan (for short Brij, Santosh and Chauhan) has been chargesheeted for offences under Sections 386/506/120-B Indian Penal Code. Whereas aforesaid four others who had been absconding have been shown in column No. 2 of the report. Proceedings under Sections 82 and 83 were initiated against these four persons and in the meantime the learned Additional Session Judge has admitted them to anticipatory bail.

( 3 ) SINCE arguments have been addressed at length in both these cases it would be proper to refer to the fa






















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top